Public defence in health science: Sofia Tallhage
Thesis title:
Amniotomy in Sweden – Prevalence, complications, and midwives’ experiences and views
Third-cycle subject area:
Health science
Faculty:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Date:
Friday 11 April 2025 at 09:00
Place for thesis:
Room Lapis, Building Vita, Kalmar and via Zoom
External reviewer:
Docent Maria Ekelin, Lund University
Examining committee:
Professor Hans Thulesius, Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University and Region Kronoberg
Docent Margareta Persson, Umeå University
Docent Malin Edqvist, Karolinska Institutet
Chairperson:
Professor Stefan Lagrosen, Department of Management, Linnaeus University
Supervisor:
Professor Marie Oscarsson, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University
Assistant supervisor:
Professor Kristofer Årestedt and Docent Kristina Schildmeijer, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University
Examiner:
Professor Stefan Lagrosen, Department of Management, Linnaeus University
Spikning:
Friday 14 March 2025 at 10:00 at University Library, Kalmar
In order to receive the Zoom link for the thesis defense, please contact Faculty Administrator Mirjam Lingkrans: mirjam.lingkrans@lnu.se
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to explore midwives’ experiences and views of amniotomy and its prevalence and complications in Sweden.
Methods: Study I was a qualitative study in which 16 midwives participated in individual interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis. Studies II, III, and IV were quantitative, for which register data from the Swedish Pregnancy Register were used, covering 95% of all births in Sweden in 2014-2020. Analyses were performed using descriptive and comparative statistics, as well as simple and multiple logistic regression.
Results: The midwives’ experienced and viewed amniotomy as both a simple everyday task and as an intervention demanding respect and wanted a clear indication of when to perform it. The overall prevalence of amniotomy in Sweden was 40%, however, variations between hospitals were observed. A decrease in the prevalence was seen for women belonging to Robson groups 1 and 3. The severe complication of umbilical cord prolapse is rare in Sweden, affecting 0.13% of labours with amniotomy. Higher parity, a baby in non-cephalic presentation, induction of labour, previous caesarean section and polyhydramnios were identified as risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse. Severe perineal trauma is more common for women who undergo amniotomy, thus amniotomy was not identified as a significant risk factor when adjusting for other risk factors in regression analysis.
Conclusion: This thesis provides evidence about amniotomy from different perspectives, including midwives and register data. Decisions on amniotomy were customized to each woman, based on the midwife’s knowledge and experience, but also regulated, and affected by the working environment. Almost half of the women who give birth in Sweden undergo amniotomy, however, variations in the prevalence between hospitals were observed. A decrease in the prevalence was seen for women with spontaneous onset of labour. Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare complication to amniotomy. Beyond previously confirmed risk factors, women with previous caesarean section and induced labour should be carefully evaluated in the decision-making of amniotomy. Amniotomy is frequently used in labours where other, confirmed risk factors for severe perineal trauma are present. Amniotomy is thus not a significant risk factor for severe perineal trauma when adjusting for the risk factors.
Keywords: Amniotomy; Complication; Labour intervention; Nulliparity; Midwifery; Multiparity; Prevalence.