Critical perspectives on cultural heritage: Re-visiting digitisation
Today, the Semantic Web and Linked Open Data are creating new value for the descriptive information in the cultural heritage sector. Libraries, museums, heritage management and archives are seeing new possibilities in sharing by turning their catalogues into open datasets that can be directly accessed, allowing cultural heritage data to be circulated, navigated, analyzed and re-arranged at unprecedented levels. This is supported by research funding bodies, governments and EU policies and numerous political interests, resulting in enormous investment in digitization projects which make cultural heritage information openly available and machine readable. But before deploying this data, one must ask: is this data fit for deployment?
Libraries, museums, heritage management and archives have long histories. Both the collections they house and the language they use(d) to describe said collections are products of that historical legacy, shaped by, amongst others, institutionalized colonialism, racism and patriarchy. Yet descriptive information is now being digitized and shared as if that legacy is not inherent to the collections. Instead, existing units of information are being distributed through new Web 3.0 technologies, bringing with it an outdated knowledge-base. Besides the risk of progressive techniques being applied to regressive content, we may also sacrifice the development of new knowledge in libraries, museums, heritage management and archives aimed at facilitating socially sustainable futures, remediating exploitative historical legacies.
For this workshop, we have invited researchers and practitioners to discuss ways in which digitisation approaches may be set up to change the nature and legacy of cultural collection prior to digital dissemination.
The workshop is co-organized by Linnaeus University (specifically by Centre for Applied Heritage and iInstitute) as well as Swedish National Heritage Board.
Co-organizers: Koraljka Golub, Anders Högberg and Ahmad Kamal.
Programme
09.00 – 09.40 Maria Drabczyk
"Understanding the social value of cultural heritage collections" See video
09.40 – 10.20 Natalie Harrower
"There’s FAIR, and there’s fair: how do we capitalise on both?" See video
10.40 – 11.20 Dominic Oldman
"Does the Semantic Web and Linked Data Adequately Represent Humanities Knowledge & Methods? A Critique of Artificial and Dualistic Computer Techniques" See video
11.20 – 12.00 Panel discussion
Speakers:
- "Understanding the social value of cultural heritage collections"
Maria Drabczyk, Head of policy and advocacy at Centrum Cyfrowe
Abstract: Digital cultural collections are gaining on importance. With more and more content being digitised alongside with accelerating technology and room for new cross-sectoral collaborations it is time for the archives to rethink their access and use strategies. And this won't be possible without a new look on digitisation and general preservation approaches. Why should collection holders put more focus on the end users - people of various professions and interests who are the beneficiaries of the archive? How can they consciously build their relationship with their audiences so that they see the value of the archives? The presentation will address these questions based on some practical examples.
- "Does the Semantic Web and Linked Data Adequately Represent Humanities Knowledge & Methods? A Critique of Artificial and Dualistic Computer Techniques"
Dominic Oldman is Head and Principal Investigator of the ResearchSpace project at the British Museum, and a Senior Curator in the Department of Ancient Egypt and Sudan.
Historical research is a complex combination of ontology and epistemology for which databases are ill equipped to represent adequately, creating reductions and fragmentation (and therefore built-in obsolescence) despite the availability of computer networks and networking. In many examples, Linked Data has inherited the qualities of the database (in term of the artificiality and reduction of content) and provides a form which can easily perpetuate a dualistic view of the world. While textual narrative can avoid some of these issues, its own limitations mean that it fails to adequately represent the full complexity of the monistic (real world) picture, consisting of different vantage points and a changing dynamic, and critically evaluate them against the available empirical information. This short presentation highlights some issues of the mindset-technology dialectic related to data orientated research and knowledge working.
- "There’s FAIR, and there’s fair: how do we capitalise on both?"
Dr. Natalie Harrower, Director Digital Repository of Ireland
FAIR is about sharing openly and enabling reuse of content through applying a series of best practices in packaging, describing, and sharing your data. But how do we go about choosing what data is fit for being FAIRified? How do the choices one makes in digitisation and curation relate to a broader sense of fairness in cultural and archival representation? Drawing on the work of the Digital Repository of Ireland, this talk will address both why cultural institutions should consider following the FAIR principles when opening and disseminating their heritage collections, what conceptions of social and cultural ‘fairness’ are supposed by FAIR, and what considerations should go into assessing, acquiring and curating those collections.